This week, we will explore strategies for evaluating sources.
There is about 30 minutes of video content this week, and you can treat them as "Story Time."
I am expecting that you will spend time reading this week with a little bit of writing. Please be make sure you have a comfortable spot. Our libraries are usually quiet in the summer.
The book
Hochfelder, David. The Telegraph in America, 1832-1920. [Electronic Resource]. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=cat06547a&AN=hig.9913728269602931&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Watch Video Two (11 minutes ~phone okay): Going to the Source*
Relevant Links
Allsides.com
Mueller Report
Internet Archive: Wayback Machine
(Procrastination: They also have a collection of old school games.)
*I deliberately tried to pick "old news," but I did not expect the news cycle this week. If you are interested, here is the full text of United States of America v. Donald J. Trump and Waltine Nauta.
In comparing the two documents, think about the purpose, intended audience, language, and length.
Search for articles and more in databases @ GALILEO: |
Go to: GALILEO | Databases by Subject | Find a Journal | All Databases A-Z |
Special e-Book collections: Popular reading @ Overdrive | Health sciences resources @ R2
Guide to popular reading in print: Poptitles
Search for videos and images in GALILEO databases: |
|
Go to: Streaming Video @ Kanopy |
Currency
When was the information published or Posted?
Has the information been revised or updated?
Is the current or out-of-date for your topic?
Are the links functional?
Relevance
Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question?
Who is the intended audience?
is the information at an appropriate level?
Have you looked at a variety of sources before choosing this ones?
Would be comfortable using this source for a research paper?
Authority
Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor?
Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given?
What are the author's qualifications to write on this topic?
Is there contact information, such as publisher or e-mail address?
Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
Accuracy
Where does the information come from?
Is the information supported by evidence?
Has the information been reviewed or refereed?
Can you verify any of the information in another sources?
Does the language or tone seem biased and free of choice?
Purpose
What is the purpose of the information?
Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear?
Is the information fact? Opinion? Propaganda?
Does the point of view appear objective and impartial?
Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
On the Media. (2014, August 1). The breaking news handbook: Active shooter edition. https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/otm/segments/breakingnews-consumers-handbook
Before you read the article, stop!
Ask yourself: Do I know and trust this website? Do I know it's reputation?